phTitle CalChamber to Comment on Impact of Unique State Laws on Workplace Flexibility, 21st Century Economy
phImage
phMainContent (November 15, 2011) How do California’s unique and cumbersome workplace laws and regulations affect employers? California Chamber of Commerce Policy Advocate Jennifer Barrera will answer that question today in comments at an informational hearing on workplace flexibility and the 21st century economy.
In her presentation to the Senate Labor and Industrial Relations Committee, Barrera will explain that California has some of the most stringent and complex labor laws in the nation, which means that employers struggle with meeting the overwhelming employment requirements imposed, rather than being able to focus on trying to develop and grow their businesses.
In addition, costly class action lawsuits for alleged labor law violations are a constant threat to employers due to the significant incentives for plaintiff attorneys to file such claims and lack of consequences for frivolous litigation.
Barrera will point out that these significant hurdles for employers in California discourage growth and job development, thereby providing no flexibility for either the employer or the employee to develop alternative work schedules or options.
Barrera will highlight two areas in which California can provide relief to employers and employees:
- Minimizing the procedures for adopting alternative workweek schedules;
- Minimizing the risk of litigation for California employers.
Given the current interpretations and/or requirements surrounding these issues, there is limited flexibility for employers to work with employees and adjust work schedules to accommodate the employees’ requests. Simplifying these requirements and providing the employee and employer with more authority to manage the work environment will alleviate some of the burden on employers while still addressing employee needs.
CalChamber has detailed areas of concern in past issue reports.
In addition, meal and rest period requirements are the subject of a case pending before the California Supreme Court.
Staff Contact: Jennifer Barrera
|