Kyocera Wireless greeted
employees with free bagels and headsets yesterday, a gentle reminder
that as of Tuesday it's no longer legal to talk on the phone while
driving in California without hands-free technology.

On the first day of Kyocera's giveaway
program, about 300 employees picked up free, wired headsets.
BRUCE K. HUFF / Union-Tribune
photos
Kyocera Wireless employee Anna Mau tried on
one of the headsets the company gave workers yesterday in
advance of Tuesday's change in state law requiring all drivers
to use hands-free technology while on the phone.
|
The pending changes in the law have
many employers thinking about how their workers use cell phones
during work hours. There are liabilities when an employee makes
personal calls while driving a company vehicle, and there's legal
exposure when a driver uses a company phone.
Some companies are issuing policies for the first time. Some are
revising existing guidelines. Others, such as Kyocera, are reminding
employees that they're required to comply with all rules of the
road.
The company sent a memo to all employees to underscore the policy
and the coming changes in the law. Employees “are expected to adhere
to federal, state or local rules and regulations regarding the use
of cellular telephones while driving,” the corporate memo said.
“This applies to both personal and company-provided cell phones, and
under no circumstances should employees place themselves or others
at risk to fulfill business needs.”
On the first day of Kyocera's giveaway program, about 300
employees picked up free, wired headsets.
Another San Diego wireless company, Qualcomm, is tightening its
cell phone policy as the new law kicks in.
Qualcomm employees are
prohibited from reading or sending text messages and e-mail while
driving. Employees driving company cars aren't allowed to use
personal cell phones while driving. And Qualcomm is providing free
wired and wireless, hands-free equipment for use with company phones
while driving.
Nothing in the new law creates additional liability for
employers, but it has created awareness and new interest, said
Jessica Hawthorne, an employment attorney with CalBizCentral, a
division of the California Chamber of Commerce.
In several high-profile cases, employers have been sued as a
result of accidents in which workers' cell phone calls might have
been a factor, Hawthorne said.
“If you're talking on the phone and are involved in an accident
where someone is injured, it's probably not just you who's going to
get sued,” she said. “If (the attorneys for the injured person) find
out you were working, they're going to go after your employer, too.”
Hawthorne said her employer has a policy banning employees from
talking on the phone while driving during work hours.
“Managers are trained to ask if employees are driving, and if
they are, make arrangements to talk later,” she said.
At San Diego-based Sharp HealthCare, the nonprofit employer is
considering a similar policy prohibiting cell phone use by employees
who are driving during work hours.
“There is some evidence that using Bluetooth or other hands-free
devices doesn't go far enough to eliminate the distraction,”
spokesman Tom Hanscom said. “We're in discussion with our insurance
carrier about whether it makes sense to ban cell phone use by our
employees who are driving.”
At The San Diego Union-Tribune, the company will
subsidize up to $25 of the cost of hands-free accessories for
employees who need to talk on the phone while driving. The company's
updated policy requires compliance with the law and authorizes
discipline up to and including dismissal for violations.
Making violations a firing offense is a fairly typical component
of corporate cell phone policies, said Ray Hixson, a corporate labor
and employment attorney at Heller Ehrman.
“It has to be connected to enforcement,” Hixson said. “Imagine a
business defending itself against a lawsuit saying, 'Well, we had
this policy, but we didn't have any consequences for violating
it.' ”
Hixson, who conducts a seminar titled “The Borderless Workplace,”
said employers have to guard against being accused of encouraging or
requiring the use of mobile technology without taking steps to
safeguard the public or employees.
“It's an issue that's getting a lot of attention,” he said. “A
lot of companies are adopting policies.”
Jonathan Sidener: (619) 293-1239; jonathan.sidener@uniontrib.com